Today at class, someone asked if what form of government was better, if Republic or Constitutional Monarchy. Obviously both forms have its pros and cons, but how to know which one is better? As we know, republic has a president or government that is elected by democracy. On the other side, monarchy power is absolute. The hereditary of Head of State has the control of the country.
Many people think that Republic is better because of democracy. The citizens have to choose the government they wanted. They think that Monarchy is unfair because always the same family will govern.Also is unfair because in those type of places not evryone can be a "government". It is not dicrimination but something related. Is like saying your family was not rich, you can be a monarch. Other people think that Monarchy is good because with only an absolute power there will not be conflicts between the different parties. Beside living in a monarchy is very expensive, all the money the monarch use it for tourism, royal sites, trade, and so on. People trust in the "monarch family". Maybe people that live in republics think how they can trust the same family for all the years or how a only person can control a whole country. IN my opinion I would not trust our president Felipe Calderon to have all the money in its power. This is because the idea everybody have in their minds: " all the governmetns still". I will like to experiment living in a Monarchy. In my opinion I imagine a country that has many order of everything, since money until streets. I think that it is not a better type of goverment, this is depending on people.
0 comments:
Post a Comment